X-Men 3 - Whither Cyclops?

Comments

Creative Screenwriting Magazine does a semi-regular podcast (it's on iTunes) and I just listened to a very interesting interview with the two writers of X-Men 3. I wasn't bowled over by the movie either and know nothing about X-Men beyond the movies, but it was fascinating hearing how such a high-profile script comes together and why certain decisions - e.g. Cyclops kicking the bucket - get made. I think they touch on most of the points you make above.
Thanks for the heads up on that one Neil. I went and downloaded and listened and I have to confess that I now believe the writers made the best of a bad situation. It also explains Anna Paquin's small role. The curse of actor availabilit strikes. I guess that why Trek ties these guys down for multi-picture deals just so they can make a movie and release it on time. It was also nice to hear them admit that Wolverine was the focus of the movies and not the comic.

I still think it was a poor finish to the 'trilogy' but I'm over the worst of the Cyclops abandonment issues. 8-)

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in